Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Georgia Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • General
    • Notes
    • Special Issue (lawclinics@50)
    • Symposium
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscription
  • Symposium
  • search

    Sorry, something went wrong. Please try your search again.
    ×

    • Articles
    • Blog posts

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://georgialawreview.org/feed
×
Notes
Vol. 46, Issue 1, 2011August 01, 2011 EDT

Market Realities Do Not Embody Necessary Economic Theory: Why Defendants Deserve a Safe Harbor under Section 2 of the Sherman Act for Exclusive Dealing

Danielle Nicole Paschal,
vertical restraints antitrust law
Photo by rawpixel.com on Unsplash
Georgia Law Review
Danielle Nicole Paschal, Market Realities Do Not Embody Necessary Economic Theory: Why Defendants Deserve a Safe Harbor under Section 2 of the Sherman Act for Exclusive Dealing, 46 Georgia Law Review (2011).
Save article as...▾
  • PDF
  • XML
  • Citation (BibTeX)

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system